Alfa Romeo/Alfa Romeo Digest Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[alfa] Re: alfa-digest V10 #458
Digesti,
I can only second Michael's opinion of the new "stylish" designs. Before Bob
Lutz left Daimler Chrysler, he was quoted as saying some new cars styling
looked like they "had been frightened by an angry kitchen appliance".
Combine this with the 1930's Diesel locomotive styling theme, and the result
is not good. And... it's gonna get worse; I just read of a pending EU
pedestrian safety requirement for a 4 inch space between outside front body
work and any hard internal components. Well, the radiators, braces, brackets
etc. aren't gonna move so the bodywork will be raised and extended further
outward for compliance. The article surmises the European cars that comply
with this will influence U.S. stying toward the "blunt theme".
George Schweikle
Lexington, KY
'76 Spider
'91 Spider Veloce
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 20:51:28 -0700
From: C M Smith <[email protected]>
Subject: [alfa] Stupid looking Alfas
(snip) "... I can safely opine that BMW does not have a monopoly on ugly
design briefs....(as an aside has anyone seen what appallingly ugly cars the
Germans are trying to pass off as stylish these days? I mean the Bangle
Beemers are breathtakingly ugly, even a Pontiac Aztec has some intellectual
honesty about it by comparison, but the newest Mercedes coupe/sedan and the
newer Audis are just butt ugly and make even Bangle designs look halfway
reasonable). "
Michael
Michael Smith
White 1991 164L
Original owner
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to [email protected]
Home |
Archive |
Main Index |
Thread Index