Re: Choke Settings and Point Dwell

To: [email protected] (Howard R Pletcher)
Subject: Re: Choke Settings and Point Dwell
From: [email protected] (John A. Landry)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 06:48:10 GMT
Cc: [email protected]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <19971122200919.AAA2187@localname> <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected] (John A. Landry)
Sender: [email protected]

[email protected] (Howard R Pletcher) scribbled in the sand:

>This is not a official explanation that I learned somewhere, but only my
>guess as to the reason for the new/used point setting difference.  It
>seems to me that the new points will probably wear down their rubbing
>block more quickly than used points as there are probably a few high
>points establishing the gap initially and .019 will quickly close to
>.016.   Not as exotic as your  carbon build-up reasoning, but it seems
>logical to me.  

Sounds reasonable to me also Howard... sounds like a good science fair
project! <grin>

Take care,

John
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[email protected]             |
Conservative Libertarian        |  Scout(R) the America others pass by
Life Member of the NRA          | in the Scout Traveler escape-machine.
WA Arms Collectors              |
Commercial Helicopter - Inst.   | 1976 Scout Traveler, V345A, 727, 3.54
http://www.halcyon.com/jlandry/ |

Prev by Date: (fwd) A *Gun Recall* by Klinton?
Next by Date: Apologies
Prev by thread: (fwd) A *Gun Recall* by Klinton?
Next by thread: Apologies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index