Re: [ihc] Gearing question

To: "Ed Sohm" <idaemes@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Rocky Lear'" <rockylear@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ihc-digest@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ihc] Gearing question
From: "Ryan Moore" <baradium@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 14:42:32 -0500
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
References: <004a01c41d91$77053570$6801a8c0@EdsLaptop>
Reply-to: "Ryan Moore" <baradium@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Sohm" <[email protected]>
To: "'Rocky Lear'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 12:46
Subject: RE: [ihc] Gearing question


> Why not 4.30s in back and 4.27 in front? Less than 1% difference. 4wd
> only on _very_ slick surfaces of course.
>
> Randy's ring and pinion site seems to be down right now, seems like you
> can get 4.27s for a Dana 70.
>
> Tom M had 4.30s made for his Dana 60, maybe he will chime in with cost
> and such.
>
> Ed

Isn't 4.27 close enough to 4.30 to not even care about the surface for 4x4?
You get more difference than that if you turn at all.

-Ryan


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 3/30/04

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [ihc] Gearing question
  - From: Ed Sohm

References:
- RE: [ihc] Gearing question
  - From: Ed Sohm

Prev by Date: Re: [ihc] Going Up!
Next by Date: [ihc] RE: Pete's mods
Previous by thread: RE: [ihc] Gearing question
Next by thread: RE: [ihc] Gearing question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index